https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/16/business/smallbusiness/why-the-irs-fails-to-crack-the-small-business-tax-nut.html
![]() |
Where is the multi-personal organization that also limits the owner's evasive possibilities? |
When revenue services are not replaced by the organization of large firms (i.e. by withholding taxes, information reporting et similia )(2), they have no choice but to directly reach taxpayers (with steady on-site checks, taking the responsibility of determining the real income).
This implies a certain "territorial control" by the IRS and the end of an audit policy politically oriented (3).
![]() |
"Big firm or Bigfoot, that is the question". |
Anyway, the tax evasion of small businesses will probably be an increasing issue in Western countries, due to: a. the rarefaction of large manufacturing firms (for intuitive reasons); b. the entrepreneurial model imported by immigrants. Stay tuned.
---------------------------------------------------------------
(1) although encouraging the feeling of a moral obligation certainly boosts the "tax fidelity".
(2) although to a different extent, we are talking about cases in which firms are"collectors on behalf of the revenue service"(according to the expression of L. Einaudi).
(3) every taxpayer is also a possible voter, while a large firm can pay millions and doesn't vote (G. Colm).
(4) there are different phenomena when the IRS: 1. questions the costs's existence (evasion "inside the books") 2. reinterprets a declared income ( the very opposite of an "under the counter" evasion)
No comments:
Post a Comment